Results

Learn about Attorney Berry’s past successful cases!

gun, assault, robbery, firearm
drink, drinking and driving, DUI, OWI, dui, owi, drinking under the influence, operating while impaired

Criminal

  • Jul 2014, State v K.J.C-S, Case No 14-003537-01-FH.

    Felonious Assault & Felony Firearm - Defendant found Not Guilty at Trial

  • Aug 2014, State v K.O., Case No sealed.

    Embezzlement $1,000 - $20,000 - Dismissed under Diversion

  • March 2015, State vs A.E.D., Case No 15-010027-01-FH.

    Larceny in a Building – Defendant found Not Guilty at Trial

  • Feb 2017, State vs S.L.G., Case No 1705534001.

    Home Invasion – 2nd Degree – Dismissed at Preliminary Exam

    Attorney Brian T Berry represented Defendant on a 15-year felony. Berry’s cross examination of the alleged victim and other witnesses resulted in the case being dismissed by the Court at preliminary examination – no costs; no fines; no penalties.

  • May 2017, Detroit vs A.M.

    Operating While Visibly Impaired - Dismissed

  • July 2017. Controlled Substance Obtaining by Fraud – Record Sealed

    Reduced from Felony to Misdemeanor, Illegal use of Controlled Substance, and placed under 7411 – record is sealed – no conviction.

  • July 2017. Uttering and Publishing - 14-year felony - Record Sealed

    Defendant placed under HYTA, no jail, record sealed - No conviction.

  • August 2017, Case No. 17-004059-01-FH

    COUNT 1 - Weapons - Discharge Firearm in or at a Building - NOT GUILTY

    COUNT 2 - Weapons - Firearms - Felony Firearm - NOT GUILTY

    After trial by jury, our Client was found Not Guilty of the felony offenses!

  • June 2018.

    Client was parked in a parking lot, with the keys in the ignition, engine running while watching a movie or show on a tablet. Behind the driver and passenger seat, police saw several containers of beer, one container was partially full with a straw sticking out of it.

    Police administered a preliminary breath test (PBT) which revealed a .18. Client was arrested. At the police station, Client blew a .10 and .11 on the Datamaster.

    In the 35th District Court, Plymouth, Michigan, Attorney Berry argued that his Client was not "operating" the vehicle at the time he was intoxicated. The district court judge found a question of fact and bound Defendant over to Frank Murphy Hall of Justice.

    Attorney Berry filed a Motion to Quash the bind over in the Circuit Court. The Circuit Court found that the district court judge abused his discretion and dismissed the OWI charge.

    A victory for the Client! It is important that judges understand the law and correctly apply it -- in this case the Circuit Court possessed the legal prowess and proficiency.

Civil

  • Item description

Business

  • Item description